Skip to content

High-Performance Data Lakehouses

Scalable Data Lakehouse & OLAP Architectures

Unify transactional data, analytical pipelines, and real-time dashboards with a lakehouse architecture sized to your actual data volume and query patterns.

Request Discovery Call

Unify transactional data, analytical pipelines, and real-time dashboards with a modern lakehouse architecture. Query latency, concurrency, and cost targets are established against your actual data volume and access patterns during discovery — not assumed from a generic “big data” reference number.

Data lakehouse architecture diagram: source systems feed ingestion, which lands in a Delta Lake table layer, processed by Spark or Trino, and served for query and BI.
Illustrative reference architecture — the actual stack is selected from your access patterns, not applied as a default.

Who this is for

Teams juggling separate, poorly-integrated systems for transactional storage, analytics, and real-time dashboards, or who’ve outgrown a single warehouse but aren’t sure whether a lakehouse, a traditional warehouse, or a low-latency serving layer (or some combination) is the right next step.

Expected outcomes

A clear decision about which workloads belong in a lakehouse versus a warehouse versus a low-latency serving system — not every named platform in our stack applied as if they’re interchangeable — plus the ingestion, governance, and query layers to support it and a migration path validated against your real data before cutover.

Scope & deliverables

Depending on where your workload actually sits, this may mean Spark/Delta Lake pipelines, Snowflake optimization, Trino federated queries across existing sources, or ClickHouse for low-latency OLAP — selected and combined based on your access patterns, not applied as a uniform stack. We also cover data quality checks, access/governance, catalog and lineage, and ingestion/orchestration where those are in scope.

Our approach

We start by profiling your actual data volume, query patterns, freshness requirements, and current pain points, propose an architecture (which may be narrower than “everything”), and validate it against a representative subset of your real data and queries before a full migration.

Client responsibilities & exclusions

You’ll need to provide representative data and query samples for us to validate against — performance and cost figures we propose are tied to that validation, not a generic benchmark. Ongoing operation of the resulting platform can be retained by your team (with documentation and handover) or scoped separately as continued support.

Related: Real-Time Data Streaming

FAQs

Do we need all four of these technologies? Almost certainly not — we'll recommend the narrowest stack that fits your actual workload, not the full list.

Can you tell us our query latency before looking at our data? No — it depends on data volume, concurrency, and freshness requirements; we validate this against your actual data rather than quote a number up front.

Key Deliverables

  • Apache Spark and Databricks Delta Lake implementations
  • Snowflake data cloud optimization
  • Trino federated queries
  • ClickHouse OLAP acceleration

Ready to talk architecture?

Request a technical discovery call with our engineering team.

Request Discovery Call